Difference between revisions of "Thematic Relation (definition)"
AndrewCarnie (talk | contribs) (→External Links) |
AndrewCarnie (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Technical Definitions]] | [[Category:Technical Definitions]] | ||
− | Semantically, every clause contains a verb which, in combination with the nouns present in the clause, forms a notion of an event or a state. Thematic | + | Semantically, every clause contains a verb which, in combination with the nouns present in the clause, forms a notion of an event or a state. Thematic relations classify the semantic relationships between a verb and the nouns in its clause. |
− | For instance, the notion of kissing requires an agent and a patient (sometimes called a theme) to make a complete semantic event. These thematic | + | For instance, the notion of kissing requires an agent and a patient (sometimes called a theme) to make a complete semantic event. These thematic relations are expressed through nouns, so we may say that in (1) ''Smith'' takes the agent thematic role, and ''Jones'' takes the patient (or theme) thematic relation. |
:''1) Smith kissed Jones.'' | :''1) Smith kissed Jones.'' | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
''Smith'' takes the agent role because he or she is the one who does the kissing. ''Jones'' takes the patient thematic role because he or she is the one being kissed. | ''Smith'' takes the agent role because he or she is the one who does the kissing. ''Jones'' takes the patient thematic role because he or she is the one being kissed. | ||
− | Linguists disagree on what an exhaustive inventory of thematic | + | Linguists disagree on what an exhaustive inventory of thematic relations would consist of. However, the following are widely accepted (adapted from Carnie 2006): |
:• [[Agent (definition)|'''Agents''']] do or precipitate the action | :• [[Agent (definition)|'''Agents''']] do or precipitate the action | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:• [[Beneficiary (definition)|'''Beneficiaries''']] are those for whom an event takes place | :• [[Beneficiary (definition)|'''Beneficiaries''']] are those for whom an event takes place | ||
− | Note that many of these thematic roles correlate with traditional [[Case (definition)|case]] distinctions. Thematic | + | Note that many of these thematic roles correlate with traditional [[Case (definition)|case]] distinctions. Thematic relations are considered purely semantic classes, and one syntactic argument may bear more than one thematic role. But clearly thematic roles do have an effect on syntax; in some generative grammars this interface with syntactic structure is handled through [[Theta Role (definition)|theta roles]]. |
==See Also== | ==See Also== |
Revision as of 07:04, 23 June 2009
Semantically, every clause contains a verb which, in combination with the nouns present in the clause, forms a notion of an event or a state. Thematic relations classify the semantic relationships between a verb and the nouns in its clause.
For instance, the notion of kissing requires an agent and a patient (sometimes called a theme) to make a complete semantic event. These thematic relations are expressed through nouns, so we may say that in (1) Smith takes the agent thematic role, and Jones takes the patient (or theme) thematic relation.
- 1) Smith kissed Jones.
Smith takes the agent role because he or she is the one who does the kissing. Jones takes the patient thematic role because he or she is the one being kissed.
Linguists disagree on what an exhaustive inventory of thematic relations would consist of. However, the following are widely accepted (adapted from Carnie 2006):
- • Agents do or precipitate the action
- • Patients (or themes) are recipients of the action
- • Experiencers feel or perceive an event
- • Themes are moved, experienced or perceived
- • Goals are entities toward which movement occurs
- • Sources are entities from which movement occurs
- • Locations are the places in which events occur
- • Instruments are used to perform an action
- • Beneficiaries are those for whom an event takes place
Note that many of these thematic roles correlate with traditional case distinctions. Thematic relations are considered purely semantic classes, and one syntactic argument may bear more than one thematic role. But clearly thematic roles do have an effect on syntax; in some generative grammars this interface with syntactic structure is handled through theta roles.
See Also
External Links
- wikipedia article on Thematic Relations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thematic_relation
References
- Carnie, Andrew. 2006. Syntax: A Generative introduction. 2nd Edition. Blackwell Publishers.