Difference between revisions of "Subject (definition)"

From Scottish Gaelic Grammar Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
the traditional definition of this term is the doer of the action. This is problematic though because while this covers most grammatical subjects, it does not cover logical or underlying subjects (ex. Objects). Some languages make a distinction between these two types by giving the subject a subjunctive case and the object an objective case. It can be seen also as the topic of the phrase of what is referred to in the sentence. In linguistics terms it is often referred to as the agent.  
+
The traditional definition of subject is the <nowiki>'doer'</nowiki> of the action. This is problematic though because while this covers most grammatical subjects, it does not cover logical or underlying subjects (ex. Objects). Some languages make a distinction between these two types by giving the subject a subjunctive case and the object an objective case. It can be seen also as the topic of the phrase of what is referred to in the sentence. In linguistics terms it is often referred to as the agent.  
  
 
==References==
 
==References==

Revision as of 18:48, 11 November 2009

The traditional definition of subject is the 'doer' of the action. This is problematic though because while this covers most grammatical subjects, it does not cover logical or underlying subjects (ex. Objects). Some languages make a distinction between these two types by giving the subject a subjunctive case and the object an objective case. It can be seen also as the topic of the phrase of what is referred to in the sentence. In linguistics terms it is often referred to as the agent.

References

Crystal, David. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. The language library. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1997.

Crystal, David, and David Crystal. The Penguin Dictionary of Language. London: Penguin, 1999.

Matthews, P. H. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

External Links

Warning: use www.wikipedia.org articles with caution, they often include inaccurate information.